The Dickinsonian

  • January 3The Dickinsonian's new website has officially launched! Stay tuned for new stories and features.

Their Body, Your Choice

Shane Shuma ’22, Opinion Columnist

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.

Email This Story

My first problem with the abortion process in the United States is that tax dollars are used indirectly to fund abortions. I am not against federal funding for Planned Parenthood regarding women’s health services and education programs, but I am against funding going towards abortion procedures. According to Chris Conover, a writer for Forbes, enough funding is given to fund 250,000 abortions a year, with most of that funding coming from the state level. The government does not actually fund 250,000 full abortions, but it subsidizes 24% of all abortion costs, with the funding equivalent to paying for 250,000 abortion procedures. I have no problem with individual states funding abortions, and I ultimately believe abortion to be a state issue. My issue is with the amount of federal funding for abortion, which is equivalent to the cost of 70,000 abortion procedures. As taxpayers we should have more direct say in what our money is used for, especially for a controversial issue like abortion, funding should be addressed at the state level.  

If you had to ask me whether I was pro-life or pro-choice, I would tell you that I am pro-freedom. While I do believe life is sacred and that abortion is something that should be much rarer in our society, I know that if the government banned abortions women would pursue different, more dangerous alternatives. What I do not agree with is the insistence that public money should help fund abortions and most of the reasoning used by pro-choice advocates to defend abortion. When I discuss abortion policy in this piece, I am referring to the vast majority of cases, (over 90% according to a Guttmacher Institute study), where the fetus was aborted not because of health issues, incest, or rape, but because the pregnancy was unplanned, and the mother was unprepared to have a baby.

Most abortions occur during an unplanned pregnancy, primarily those among single women. Birth control and the modern condom have led to a large reduction in unplanned pregnancies; however, abortion is still often used as a last resort and many people who understand the risks of unprotected sex still engage in it anyway. There should be no excuse in a developed country like the United States why elective abortions are still very common. Birth control methods are cheap and easily accessible and the birth control method with a 100% success rate, abstinence, is free. If you cannot afford to take care of a child, pay an average of less than $1 day for birth control, or buy condoms, then you most likely should not be engaging in sexual activities that could lead to reproduction. For those who still claim birth control is too expensive, a first trimester abortion costs an average of $397 and an average of $854 for a second trimester abortion. Even with state and federal assistance the women having these procedures are fronting most of the bill.

Another common defense of abortion I hear is that if the child will be born into unfortunate circumstances, it is better that the child is not born. Most people who are not as privileged as many of us are have lived hard and tragic lives, does that make their lives have any less value? Should a child not have the opportunity to rise above their challenges, to laugh and love, and be free? Isn’t it better to have lived and lost than to never have lived at all? I understand that there is much debate about when life begins and what constitutes a life, but can we at least try to be more careful so we won’t have to have public debates on whether a fetus should or should not be aborted depending on the circumstance? It is unfortunate I must make an emotional appeal, but this issue strikes very close to home for me. My older sister adopted three children, each one coming from troubled backgrounds. My little niece was abandoned at home while her parents were doing drugs and she was left to scavenge for food as an infant. She now lives with my sister, and she is a part of a large and loving family and has even gone to Disney World. Should she have been aborted to spare her a hard life?

The purpose of this piece is not to ask for abortions to be banned or to require women to carry pregnancies they do not want, I simply want people to understand that abortion is a serious thing. Be careful and safe and you will most likely never need to have an abortion done. My moral and emotional appeals are not to make women out to be evil, but to show that an advanced society such as ours should strive to make abortions rarer. While I believe the federal government should stay out of most abortion policy, states should have the right to determine for themselves what they believe is right. Ultimately, I think abortions should remain legal, but education programs and increased awareness are needed to reduce the cause and need for abortions. To quote Hillary Clinton, abortions should be “safe, legal and rare, and by rare, I mean rare.”

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

2 Responses to “Their Body, Your Choice”

  1. Ilana Gruber on November 29th, 2018 7:20 pm

    Thanks to this incredibly insightful man, I finally understand that abortion is a serious thing! What would we do if we didn’t have men to tell us these things about our own bodies?! In all seriousness, the last thing we need is men telling us about abortion and why we shouldn’t need it if we just “prepare” better to be mothers, not be single and having sex, or just not engage in sex because we’re just too lazy and stupid to get contraception! The author is absolutely ignorant to the realities of being a woman in the United States. Have you ever tried to get an extra pack of birth control because you’re going on vacation and won’t be able to get it before hand? Did you know that many insurances only allow you to get your next refill only after a whole month has passed and not a single day before?! Now do I have to shell out $20 to buy it out-of-pocket because I can’t pick it up before I leave for my trip?? I will now provide you some insight with scholarly evidence to back it up. Did you know that nearly 33% of women still pay for their birth control (Sonfield et al. 2014)? Did you know that insurance companies can refuse to cover name brand contraceptives, such as the (more effective) Ella emergency contraception pill, even though there is no generic alternative (Sobel 2015)? Did you know that, per HRSA guidelines, insurers are only required to cover contraceptive methods (including emergency contraception) “as prescribed” (HRSA 2016)? And therefore emergency contraception may not be covered by insurers without a prescription, and in 2013 the average price of the most commonly available emergency contraceptive, Plan B One-Step, was almost $48 (American Society for Emergency Contraception 2013)?? No, I bet you did not know this. If you morally disagree with women getting abortions, that is fine. But women do not need men critiquing their healthcare choices, especially when they are ill-informed on the realities of being a woman. Please read my paper, “Restricted or Protected? An Analysis of American Contraception Policy and Its Effects” published on the Dickinson website to become more informed before writing your follow-up article.

  2. Julia Ritger on November 29th, 2018 11:02 pm

    Birth control is cheap and easily accessible? That’s a joke and a half! Without insurance birth control pills can be $200 dollars a month.

The Dickinsonian strives to provide a forum for lively and respectful discussion among members of the Dickinson College community. We reserve the right to remove any comments that we do not adhere to our community standards.

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.


The student news site of Dickinson College.
Their Body, Your Choice