Last month, the President’s Office announced that the upcoming commencement speaker is Mike Smerconish, who will also receive an honorary doctorate of public affairs.
Smerconish is a prolific political commentator, with media spanning across his eponymous radio show, a daily newsletter, his own program on CNN, a live performance, and seven books. Few political commentators have had such a successful career. So why does Dickinson deserve better?
In 2004, Smerconish released the book Flying Blind: How Political Correctness Continues to Compromise Airline Safety Post 9/11, in which he argues that in order to keep America safe, the TSA should deliberately target Arabs and Muslims for searches because they look like the perpetrators of past terrorist attacks.
The following are a few excerpts from his book:
“We’re fighting a war against young Arab male extremists, and yet our government continues to enforce political correct “random screening” of airline passengers instead of targeting those who look like terrorists. Why? Because they don’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings. Essentially, they are putting more emphasis on protecting diversity than protecting our safety. In fact, when our government believes that our airlines are focusing attention on passengers who resemble the known terrorists, they fine them millions of dollars.” (Flying Blind, 12). According to Smerconish, ethnic discrimination is a requirement for American safety. However, profiling doesn’t just hurt someone’s feelings; it is a reminder that no matter how much Arabs and Muslims integrate into American culture, we are viewed as a foreign threat. To suffer racial profiling is to be dehumanized.
When interviewing Americans on airport security, Smerconish endorses the following statement:
“I am a 64-year-old strawberry blond, Irish/Italian woman boarding at Phila International …After surrendering my sneakers, I was pulled out of line (off to the side) to submit to hand search by another security guard. The second person in front of me, a male wearing a turban on his head went through with no problem.” (Flying Blind, 50). Notice that Smerconish frames a visibly Muslim man going through security peacefully as threatening. There is no real evidence that this man should be considered suspect, unless being a racial or religious “other” is inherently suspect. If his racism wasn’t obvious enough, this excerpt makes it clear:
“The TSA should at least be paying extra attention to those who share characteristics – either racial or circumstantial – with those who have been known to commit terror acts in the past. Makes sense to me.” (Flying Blind, 163). This is as blatant as it could possibly be. In no uncertain terms, Smerconish advocates for racial profiling.
Smerconish defends his positions in an op-ed for Myrtle Beach Sun News titled “Some profiling just makes sense.” In this article, he holds equalthe left-sided backlash to his position with backlash from conservative media surrounding a report from the Department of Homeland security highlighting concerns over domestic right-wing terrorism. How Smerconish can compare wearing a hijab or having brown skin to skinheads is absolutely beyond me. This trend continues in a 2015 tweet where Smerconish states “Muslims who call Islamic State un-Islamic are typically ‘embarrassed and PC with cotton-candy view of own religion.”
Doesn’t the class of 2024 deserve someone better?
I’m outraged, frustrated, and disappointed. As a Muslim Arab American first-year, I have been welcomed with open arms by my upperclassmen. They have encouraged me to grow as an academic, as a friend, as an advocate, and as a member of the Dickinson community.
I find them in Denim, being patient with shy students struggling with their orders. I find them in classrooms and the Multilingual Writing Center giving students the means to better express themselves. I find them in cultural clubs empowering us to be in touch with each other and with ourselves. I find them leading marches in the night, giving space for righteous anger. I find them pushing the envelope in research, exploring new ideas and solutions. This class is one that nurtures, that empowers, that values justice and community. Does someone like Mike Smerconish in any way represent the achievements and ambitions of its students?
If Dickinson truly loves and values its students, shouldn’t it honor them with someone who reflects that love?
David N. Taylor • May 6, 2024 at 3:40 pm
It is a disgrace for the Alma Mater to give in to the heckler’s veto. Eric Holder was deemed a suitable commencement speaker in 2021 despite his extreme views. Tolerance, patience, and a willingness to hear contrasting viewpoints are critical life skills. Too bad the Class of 2024 is being told otherwise.
Dickinson Alum • May 6, 2024 at 1:23 pm
Curious if the Dickinson professors who studied and specialize in the 9/11 security response agree with Smerconish’s dismissal from commencement. Why or why not?
Dickinson, please make this a teachable moment, not a culture war, for the entire community.
Franklin Williams • May 6, 2024 at 11:14 am
I am a lomgtime admirer (if from a distance) of your school and its president. I share and support most if not all of your concerns and goals in your recent demonstrations–very strongly and sincerely–and have opposed and condemned prejudice in all its ugly forms for all 60-some my adult years. Because I hope to continue to learn until my last day of life, I have read all about your views re. your (now former) commencement guest–as I’ve depended on his weekly TV show because he welcomes guests worth hearing, with responsible but widely differing viewpoints–an inclination you seem to lack but which I hope you will gain as you move through life. I join Smerconish in wish you all the best.
Jon • May 6, 2024 at 9:59 am
To the author of this opinion piece: I sincerely hope the political winds do not change such that you are denied any opportunity 20 years from now when your words are viewed through a future lens.
Whether you now agree with words Mr. Smerconish wrote between 2001 and 2004, possibly before you were born, is irrelevant. Shouting down someone you disagree with is not acceptable. And it is ineffective. If anything, the opinions of the people you shout down may strengthen.
Mik • May 8, 2024 at 1:11 am
Didn’t he double down and repeat this stuff last week? Not really a matter of an outdated opinion here.
Sarah • May 1, 2024 at 9:25 pm
I am surprised Dickinson ever chose Smerconish in the first place. I value free speech but a commencement address by someone who has called for unfair treatment of people goes against what Dickinson claims to stand for.
Anna Herrick • May 1, 2024 at 5:09 pm
When it comes to screening passengers, I disagree with Mike Smirconish. But that’s not reason enough to cancel him. Why not just get an additional speaker, with opposing views to Smirconish?
Here’s the part the part of the article titled The Class of 2024 Deserves Better Than Smerconish that really stands out: “If Dickinson truly loves and values its students, shouldn’t it honor them with someone who reflects that love?” Also, the letter from the Editorial Board with its concern about Dickinson failing to ensure student’s safety and comfort during commencement by having Smirconish as a speaker.
Since when is it a college’s job to make sure students are comfortable and loved?
Grow up! You’ll survive listening to someone you disagree with.
John • May 1, 2024 at 4:04 pm
This piece is an excellent and succinct critique. I agree with the writer: Smerconish should absolutely be removed as commencement speaker. His past and present racist remarks are the opposite of Dickinson College’s stated values and educational mission.
Whether in 2004 or 2024, Smerconish’s rhetoric, as quoted in the piece, reflect the draconian policies of racist policing that many self-defined progressives claim to reject. At a time when President Biden is expanding Trump’s border wall, deportations remain high, and weapons are regularly shipped to Israel from U.S. companies, Dickinson students understand that Smerconish’s commentary puts them at risk for racist violence. There is no question about his exclusionary values.
Commencement is a time to celebrate the achievements of the graduating class. It is not a time to honor the work of a commentator who has publicly ridiculed student protestors, expressed xenophobic policy endorsements, and campaigned for the death penalty against political prisoners in Philadelphia. Shame on Dickinson College if Smerconish is still invited to commencement. If colleges are currently “reckoning” with their histories of institutional racism — including genocide against Native peoples and Black people who were enslaved — then can they also “reckon” with the racism of their present?
This writer, speaking through their own community experience at Dickinson, is absolutely right to call out this blatant contradiction between the college’s written commitment to “strategically create initiatives and policies that foster diversity and address inequities” and Smerconish’s xenophobia. This writer is courageous, compelling, and correct in their insight. Hopefully the President, the Board of Trustees, and the Administration will hear them.
Sarah • May 2, 2024 at 8:50 am
Bravo! Thank you for your comment. It sums up everything I thought clearly and succinctly. Thank you!
Jimbo • May 6, 2024 at 12:17 pm
John, please tell me why you chose to omit the name Mumia Abul-Jamal from your comment? He is obviously the so called political prisoner in Philadelphia. Only those who have failed to read the compelling evidence in this case continue to call him a political prisoner. Which happens to be most folks from outside of the Philly area or those who never followed the case.
Smerconish is one of the most fair commentators in media today.
JR MD • May 6, 2024 at 1:28 pm
In other words, you only want to hear from those who are perfectly aligned with your opinions; as it is too painful to deal with those who may somewhat differ.
Smerconish stands accused & he cannot defend himself unless it fits with your narrative. Lack of insight is glaring.
A Dickinson Professor • May 1, 2024 at 12:36 pm
Smerconish is preparing to be our commencement speaker by mocking this editorial with a co-host who “isn’t sure it’s worth mentioning” after discussions of larger schools and attacks its “shoddy reporting.” (search youtube for “Smerconish school daze” and skip to 5:40 or so)
Smerconish ends his segment by averring that he plans to stand by every word he wrote in the 2004 defense of racial profiling that this editorial takes issue with. Sounds like your reporting wasn’t so shoddy after all!
I question whether Smerconish is a good choice for commencement speaker. In addition to everything else, I don’t want him to read aloud a casino ad before congratulating the class of 2024.
Michael Clarence Grant • May 1, 2024 at 10:31 am
As much as I admire Michael Smerconish’s devotion to a fair and balanced outlook, he was wrong on this point. He is good, he is honorable and he is human. Forgive him this error.
Sarah • May 2, 2024 at 8:53 am
He is attacking a Dickinson Muslim Arab American first-year student. He has called attention to her name nationally and potentially could cause her harm. I do not consider that good or honorable. He is decades older with a lifetime of experience, and he chose to attack a 19-year-old. He seems like a selfish fool, unable to grow and desperately trying to cling to a time when he was relevant.
LET'S BE FAIR • May 6, 2024 at 9:28 am
This is a lie.
WelshRabbit • May 6, 2024 at 5:31 pm
Attacking a 19 yr old freshman? She is an adult, who bravely put herself out there when she voluntarily wrote and submitted that opinion piece. And Smerconish responded to that criticism. The whole point of an editorial or opinion piece in a publication is to invoke thought and reaction; both pro and con, for and against.
You can not speak your mind and then be offended or outraged when someone pushes back on your thinking or opposes your point of view. She felt so strongly about Smerconish that she wrote the piece so now she needs to strongly listen to his response. I think we will have missed an opportunity to learn something by removing him from Commencement.
Sterl • May 8, 2024 at 1:09 am
He recently doubled down on his position 😬 can’t forgive him for a mistake he’s actively making
Edgar Ellsworth • May 1, 2024 at 9:46 am
Let Michael speak and you will receive a thoughtful speech relevant to the current state of affairs. He is, by far, the most fair and balanced political commentator in the U.S. He will provide an objective speech with critical thinking that the graduating class will appreciate.
Victor • May 1, 2024 at 8:53 am
NO, nothing wrong with Michael