College Outlines Spring 2021 Possibilities Amid Ongoing Pandemic
Faculty gathered via Zoom on Tuesday, Oct. 20 to discuss President Margee Ensign’s proposed scenarios for the spring 2021 semester in light of the ongoing coronavirus pandemic.
Ensign outlined six main possibilities, with various contingencies and variations within each option. On one end of the spectrum was the possibility of continuing with a completely remote spring semester. Conversely, the other extreme included inviting all students back to campus. In between these two scenarios lay four other variations, all of which included bringing students back in some capacity.
One of these included inviting just half of the student population back to campus while the other half continued to learn remotely for the entire semester. Ensign also discussed inviting two class years back for just the first half of the semester and then switching halfway through. Another plan included bringing two class years back for the first half and then, if measures to contain the virus appeared to be under control, invite the second half of the student body to join them for the last seven weeks of the semester. In discussing these possible options, Ensign did not specify exactly which class years she would invite back in each scenario. Lastly, the president also mentioned the possibility of delaying the start of the spring semester to aid in avoiding the coronavirus’ overlap with flu season. Ensign hopes to make a final decision on the spring 2021 semester in the first week of November.
Campus capacity to house students is another factor in the college’s decision. In a call with The Dickinsonian, George Stroud, vice president for student life and dean of students, said that administration was working on multiple plans for different scenarios in terms of housing.
“We are pretty confident that whichever plan that we have we will have isolation space in place,” said Stroud. “The challenge is trying to predict how many people will actually show up depending on which scenario we put in place, and so we’re making those estimates now,” said Stroud, adding that “before we make a decision, we will make sure there is enough quarantine and isolation space carved out in order to accommodate the students.”
Throughout Tuesday’s discussion, Ensign and Stroud continuously reiterated that if invited back, there would still be students who would choose not to return to campus. They noted that instruction would be provided to them regardless of whether the class met in-person at any point. However, with this discussion came the question of the best modality for class instruction, including whether to offer classes remotely, via a hybrid method of instruction, or make in-person classes available.
In an interview with The Dickinsonian, regarding preparations for students potentially returning, Ensign also discussed the Pennsylvania Department of Health’s phone application that can be helpful with COVID tracing. The application, COVID Alert PA, notifies anyone whose phone was next to another person’s phone who tested positive for more than 15 minutes of their possible exposure to COVID-19. However, “for it to be more effective, everyone’s gotta sign up,” Ensign said. She also noted that the school has gained access to six national labs and initiatives for COVID-19 testing along with hiring a contact tracer for the year.
Lastly, Ensign spoke about the Carlisle Community Action Network’s (CAN) masking initiative, in which posters, banners, and masks have been to advertise the initiative’s goal to “shop safely, learn safely.”
Ensign said that businesses following health and safety guidelines will be featured on a list of places that students will be able to go. “So we’re not going to shame people in town for not wearing them, but we are going to support people who are part of this initiative,” Ensign said. “So it’s not just the testing and tracing. People actually have to follow the guidelines religiously. And that’s why we’ve been supporting and helping develop this initiative,” Ensign added.
“For people to return safely here, whoever is on campus, we’re not restricting you from the community, but we need to make sure the community itself is safe and following all the public health guidelines,” Ensign added.
Jill • Oct 29, 2020 at 2:52 pm
I guess I am more confused than anything. Because I am acutely aware that multiple universities in and around our area and all over the country are making college work. My daughter who attends Susquehanna University just an hour away from Carlisle…has all her classes in person and every class was brought back over the course of a couple weeks starting in August . They have 14 total cases since August 3rd! If they can make it work Dickinson can make it work and bring everybody back.
I don’t know why all of these options are even being considered. Give President Greene a call at SU to hear how they are making it work.
They don’t have an empty dorm to use as a hospital for those infected, theyve only had 14 positives for gosh sake…they attend their classes in person, they wear masks, social distance but its not a jail cell.
Our kids deserve better, get them back to IN PERSON classes, give them the Dickinson education they deserve, the education we are paying for and why we choose Dickinson… freshman, sophomores, juniors and seniors!
Maureen Cooney • Oct 29, 2020 at 11:56 am
I believe these 6 scenarios are being presented a semester too late. These scenarios should have been in play for the fall semester. Dickinson has now had 7plus months to form a plan to bring all students back safely for spring.. And only now this late into October , they present possible scenarios?I l am disheartened to see well into the fall semester possible spring semester options. The spring semester should already be decided after 7 plus months. My student would like to have enough time for other options. As another poster mentioned, the other small schools are in session and doing well.
Brendan W • Oct 28, 2020 at 8:03 pm
I respectfully disagree with the notion that it would be, in any way, impractical or impossible to offer the opportunity for all students to return to campus for the entire semester. The stats from our peer institutions say it all. As just a sampling of our peers, Bates, Bucknell, Colby, Colgate, Connecticut, Davidson, Denison, Hamilton, HWS, Midd, Skidmore, Swarthmore, Vassar, Wesleyan, and Wheaton, among countless others, managed to bring back ALL of their students this fall successfully. While most of these institutions have had a handful of cases over the course of the last 7-10 weeks (this was a given going into the situation), even those well-immersed in larger towns/cities (Wesleyan, Bates, and Swarthmore stand out to me), they have pulled off creating a safe environment for their respective localities. These are all schools Dickinson regularly compares itself against. This challenge proves no different.
I can only imagine that another fully/partially remote semester would mean a significant financial hit… not to mention the incalculable hit to school morale, retention (would first years want to stay/have any reason to after their entire first year—25% of their time at D’son was online?), and allegiance. If off-campus housing had not been eliminated, and if the College had not divested from countless apartment/housing leases throughout Carlisle, perhaps they’d have more room for quarantine/isolation today.
Speaking to the middle two ideas… there is a reason why no other school has tried the mid-semester addendum of students. The community as a whole has worked together to identify, trace, and contain the spread of the virus. Then, you bring in hundreds of students from across the country and around the world, presumably doubling them up with roommates who have already been screened and tested multiple times. It’s a recipe for unnecessary spread and disaster. The mid-semester switch hasn’t been tried often, as well for similar reasons. Assuming we we need a two-week reduced movement period when first arriving and waiting for test results, each cohort of students would have a mere five weeks of a campus where you could move around with relative ease, albeit COVID precautions and restrictions. Only bringing back half of the study body (of course seniors and first years) would be painful to the sophomores and juniors, but at least make more logistical sense if choosing an alternative to bringing back the full study body (give everyone a single for the entire semester… hence no need for additional quarantine space). Still, we don’t need to resort to this arrangement.
The most sensible situation would be an extremely delayed start to the semester, cancelling spring break and replacing it with scattered mental-health days throughout the semester. Incentivize, or stop us from bringing cars to campus. Dickinson should strongly consider joining the ranks of Midd… delay the semester start until March, when all projections indicate we should have peaked over this winter outbreak. Testing can only improve between now and then. Spending an incredible amount of resources on testing will be imperative—we’ve learned you can’t avoid this. Look to the ranks of Boston University, testing each one of it’s 10’s of thousands of students every third day. They’ve managed to keep countless students spread across one of America’s largest cities, both on and off campus safe, stomping out the spread of the virus. Waiting longer to start can’t harm us. Beyond testing, Carlisle is very warm by mid-March… easy to hold outside classes in tents. By any luck, our most vulnerable across the US will have access to a safe and effective vaccine by time March rolls around, hopefully easing burden on our healthcare systems.
I firmly believe the College CAN indeed bring all students back for the full spring semester. To accomplish this, delaying a full return of students in the spring only makes sense—it’s on Dickinson to commit and make it happen.
Judy Hamilton • Oct 26, 2020 at 9:03 pm
Totally disagree. I believe it’s a very manageable situation with a school this size. Sadly my high school senior and his classmates have decided not to apply to Dickinson for Fall of 21, choosing instead to apply to schools that brought students on campus with well defined action plans. We are following the Covid dashboards of these schools, and so far they’re succeeding.
Luke Nicosia • Oct 26, 2020 at 5:10 pm
I will say this much on the Spring semester. As much as people may feel otherwise, I’m personally convinced that there is very little chance we are back on campus next semester. It’s not a matter of preference, it’s simply a matter of predicting what’s going to happen. A lot of states are seeing increased cases, and plenty of schools the same size as Dickinson have had numerous issues. In fact, at least three local schools for me in New York have shut down because of high case reports. And we’re not even to Winter yet.
Having everyone back, unfortunately, is just not going to work, no matter how logistically sound any plan may seem. People are going to have social events, and people are going to get sick. The worst-case scenario for a small-school is definitely a worst-case. But even for large schools, with a spread out population and more isolated living spaces, it’s also a problem. My younger brother goes to Texas, and he tells me that out of 50,000 students, 1,000 have tested positive. And they’re not even meeting on campus.
Best-case scenario for Dickinson, when bringing people back, is hardly something to look forward to either. Social activities won’t be held (large ones). Dining hall scenarios are going to be bizarre, if not difficult to maneuver during peak lunch hour. Gym use is going to be highly regulated (and in some cases, such as club basketball, likely not to happen at all). In all likelihood, the expectation will be that people spend most of their time in their dorm room, which isn’t fun, especially when being home for many of us would be an equally preferable, if not more preferable, situation. And lastly, we risk interruption in the instance that case numbers get out of control.
I really believe that there is no good scenario for bringing everyone back. Even if there are no outbreaks of cases, conditions on campus are going to suck, maybe not as much as being at home would, but nevertheless will suck. There’s really no case for bringing everyone back out of safety, as if you look at how other colleges big or small are doing around the nation, there has not been that much success. I believe that we won’t be going back for the Spring, and hope that everyone else is prepared for that decision to be made in November.
Naiomi Capellan • Oct 25, 2020 at 7:29 pm
The Dickinsonian should run a poll of these 6 options, it would be really interesting to know how the public feels about each option.