The Identitarian Left and the Alt-Right are Equally Racist
In 2019, two views of the current state of America can generally be said to dominate the political environment. To many Americans, we have the collective privilege of living in a nation where clean water is an expectation, grocery stores offer an entire meal for one hour of minimum wage labor, and even the poorest of society can chase the American Dream. To others, however, we live in a society where rampant racism plagues every aspect of American life and must be vanquished by any means necessary, no matter how radical. Some may even argue the truth lies somewhere in the middle, but those who cannot fathom or accept a United States with unparalleled freedom and opportunity instead wish to dismantle decades of racial tolerance and nurture the growth of tribalism in America. These people tend to side with either the identitarian left or the alt-right, who, though on two separate wings of the American political spectrum, are remarkably aligned when comparing their stances on segregation.
We may have the collective privilege of living in the greatest time in human history, but the identitarian left and the alt-right desire to reverse this progress. What should be thought of as a terrible era of the past has become common thought among identitarians on the left and the right, spreading even to our finest educational institutions. In 2017, Harvard held its first exclusively black graduation ceremony. The Independent wrote at the time how “all-black ceremonies have been held at other US universities, such as Stanford and Columbia, but this will be a historic first for Harvard.” After years of fighting for racial equality in education, there are those who not only see segregation as a potentially beneficial policy, including in the ivory tower, but desire to implement it. Just a year prior, Fox News reported that California State University LA was “the latest public school of higher education to establish African-American-priority housing in response to demands from black students seeking refuge from what they consider insensitive remarks and ‘microaggressions’ from their white classmates.” While not explicitly segregated, these dorms would be, by intent, overwhelmingly black and lacking the diversity modern colleges boast of. I cannot understand how “microaggressions” justifies the segregating of dorms on college campuses, a practice once thought of as a piece of the past; however, the identitarian left sees further dividing our country along racial lines as a good thing. They see segregation as justified through intersectionality, drawing a fine line between minorities in the United States, or at least the categories they wish to recognize, and the white majority. What kind of future does this aim to build? Does it make any sense that we must segregate society in order to better race relations? Never once do they consider, as Ayn Rand put it, that “the smallest minority on earth is the individual.”
Luckily the alt-right does not have nearly the same influence as the identitarian left in our educational institutions, but their ideas are just as diametrically opposed to American values. Covering the alt-right, the Anti-Defamation League wrote in an informative article that “American Identitarians such as Richard Spencer claim to want to preserve European-American (i.e., white) culture in the U.S.” Such a dream could only materialize, albeit as a nightmare for anyone not obsessed with the amount of melanin in one’s skin, through the racial segregation and legalization of discrimination in society. This is where the great irony in the struggle between the two identitarian wings appears. Both camps have values that conflict almost entirely with the other, and yet they would both likely cheer on the segregation of black people in colleges. The identitarian left, of course, would likely view it as a “safe space” for people of color, while the alt-right would likely view it as a reactionary victory for the preservation of the white race. In both cases, the unity of the United States is harmed by the intentional division of Americans simply by race and sex.
This is what the ideas and the rhetoric of identitarians are doing to society. The disgusting narrative of identifying and placing value on an individual based on the groups with which they associate paired with the logically inept hierarchical concept of oppression is sending us back decades culturally and reopening racial wounds that were once thought to be healed. We must continue on the path toward greater individual value and the tolerance of difference. We cannot teach our children of the tragedy of racial segregation if we continue to willingly segregate ourselves along racial lines. If we are to stay as one nation, united under the values of freedom and opportunity for all, we must end our drift toward identitarian policies – left and right.
Fred hall • Aug 6, 2019 at 12:15 pm
Notice how you immediately put the author in an identity group, assumed a bunch of stuff about him, and verociously attacked him.
Actions speak louder than words.
It seems to me the author hit the nail on the head.
Job Samuels • Jul 1, 2019 at 1:42 pm
The last two comments, by a and William Collins, play right into the author’s hands and prove his point. Their failure to take the race blinders off and not reduce life experience to a matter of race (that, lo, only a person of color could understand) communicate ignorance and intolerance. A more thoughtful, less intellectually stunted approach requires dropping these convenient ideological assumptions.
Jeff Slater • Jun 10, 2019 at 12:21 pm
@Michael Neibel
Your reading of Kant misrepresents his ideas. It confuses his claims about the ontological nature of reality with claims about the phycological and sociological nature of reality. Kant’s claims have to do with the ontological nature of reality and you’ve conflated them with other issues.
When Kant was speaking of the noumenal world (his term for “things in themselves”) verses the phenomenal world (his term for “things as they appear”); he was not speaking about one’s perception of group identity, or the ability of a person to distinguish an individual from their identity group, or the like. Kant was not speaking about one’s phycological interpretations of identity categories regarding persons or any psychological or sociological subjects at all.
Kant was saying that ontologically our perception of reality is based upon by our sense perceptions and their ability to veridically perceive the outer world. For example, a bat using sonar to navigate a cave is not perceiving the “thing in itself”—that is, the bat is not perceiving the true ontological reality of the cave —but, instead is perceiving a phenomenological representation of the cave (ie the thing as it appears).
Our perception and senses represent the outer world but they are not ontologically identical to the outer world. Is a dog’s phenomenological experience of the outer world a veridical experience that is identical to the true nature of the outer world—no—nor, is our phenomenological experience a veridical experience identical to the true nature of the outer world.
Our mind and perceptions have been shaped and are a product of evolutionary pressures and the processes of natural selection; our minds were evolved not to perceive a perfect, veridical perception of the outer world, but in order to survive within the outer world.
You can think about our perception as akin to a computer desktop, it was shaped by evolutionary pressures, its purpose is to navigate and survive within the world, not to have a perfect veridical perception of it.
Another way to think about it is as being similar to Plato’s Allegory of the Cave. In Plato’s Cave there are people chained up so that they can only see the wall that they are facing; they have a fire burning behind them that casts its shadows on the wall in front of them. They can see the shadows cast by the fire, but they can’t see what is casting them, but only infer what is casting them. Plato says that this is the situation that we are in; we can only see the shadows of the actual nominal world. In Plato’s example, he says that being able to perceive the actual noumenal world would be like breaking these chains, escaping out of the cave, and walking out into the sunlight.
In sum, Kant was saying that our phenomenological perceptions are not ontologically identical to the outer world; and, that because of this we can only perceive the phenomenal world (ie “things as they appear”) not the noumenal world (ie “things in themselves”). And, most importantly, this is a ontological claim that has nothing to do with perceptions in regards to identity, group identity, or sociological constructs.
KWMandy • Apr 11, 2023 at 10:06 pm
That certainly cleared things up…
William Collins • Apr 20, 2019 at 1:13 pm
This young person obviously has little or no understanding/knowledge of American history. Officially governmental racist laws existed as recently as 1967 – only 52 years ago. Tell us when were the racial wounds in our beloved country healed. I would suggest that Bryce actually take a Black studies course or even engage in a dialogue (non-confrontational of course) with someone who attended the Black graduation ceremony. To equate celebrating the success of Black students with those on the alt-right who attack Jews, Muslims, people of color, etc either physically or rhetorically is a truly cosmic stretch.
a • Apr 12, 2019 at 3:58 pm
The “opinions” section of The Dickinsonian seems to be simply a space in which students can shamelessly write bigoted, ignorant pieces without any semblance of a coherent argument or adequate research. I’m seriously wondering what the editors of The Dickinsonian are thinking in repeatedly publishing such underdeveloped, insensitive articles. This (almost indubitably white) author is asserting that he understands systems of oppression better than actual people of color in America, and that the desires of POCs to form supportive communities is equally harmful as white supremacy.
“To many Americans, we have the collective privilege of living in a nation where clean water is an expectation, grocery stores offer an entire meal for one hour of minimum wage labor, and even the poorest of society can chase the American Dream.” Where are the citations to support such claims? Not providing any evidence or support to such contentious and dubious arguments such as these is simply lazy journalism. The Dickinsonian is an embarrassment to Dickinson students.
Michael Neibel (@mikeneibel) • Apr 12, 2019 at 12:19 pm
The concepts identitarian and identity politics are are outward manifestations of what Ayn Rand called the concrete bound mentality. Such a mentality only focuses of how things appear to be instead of how they really are. This of course is a gift from Immanuel Kant who about 200 years ago, told us that the world in which we live is only a world of appearances which he called the phenomenal world. According to him, there is a realm where things are what they really are which he called the noumenal world but which is not available to us humans so we have to confine ourselves to appearances. Mr Kant was wrong. There is a real world out there and each of us is capable of knowing any part of it we want to. The way to end identitarianism is to look behind the identity for the substance. Every identity has one. It could be true or false, but it is there.
John Donohue • Apr 12, 2019 at 10:02 am
While you do acknowledge that the “L” has more of an influence than the “R”, I would recommend a look at the true perspective: The Intersectional Left is gigantic in comparison. The actual Alt-Right, while despicable, is minuscule, and hasn’t the slightest peep of a chance of going anywhere near a college campus, let alone actuating segregation by race.
Your last paragraph is strong, an anthem I wish every young person headed into a sea of sectionalism would read and take seriously.
Dana • Apr 12, 2019 at 12:19 am
dickinsonian freshmen men shut up challenge 2019